(Created page with "Con frecuencia oímos que empresas y servicios (e incluso algunos investigadores y organizaciones sin animo de lucro) argumentan que protegen a los usuarios porque '' '' '' an...")
Con frecuencia oímos que empresas y servicios (e incluso algunos investigadores y organizaciones sin animo de lucro) argumentan que protegen a los usuarios porque '' '' '' anonimizan los datos que recogen, implicando que con ello su "privacidad" está a salvo. No obstante se ha demostrado que nuestros rastros de datos son tan únicos, al igual que nuestras huellas digitales, que si los analistas
+
We frequently hear companies and services (and even some researchers and non-profit organizations) argue that they protect users by '''anonymizing''' the data they collect, so your 'privacy' is safe with them. But it has been proven that our data traces are so unique to us—just like our fingerprints—that if data analysts have a small sample set of data about us, they can analyse that information to uniquely identify and reveal individuals according to the distinctive types and patterns of digital traces we create that form our ‘digital shadows’.
−
cuentan con un pequeño conjunto de muestras de datos acerca de nosotras, pueden conseguir identificarnos de forma única y revelar los individuos de acuerdo a los tipos distintivos de rastros digitales que conforman nuestras 'sombras digitales'.
+
Latest revision as of 08:03, 25 September 2019
We frequently hear companies and services (and even some researchers and non-profit organizations) argue that they protect users by anonymizing the data they collect, so your 'privacy' is safe with them. But it has been proven that our data traces are so unique to us—just like our fingerprints—that if data analysts have a small sample set of data about us, they can analyse that information to uniquely identify and reveal individuals according to the distinctive types and patterns of digital traces we create that form our ‘digital shadows’.