Methodologies for training

This is a property of type Text.

Pages using the property "Methodologies for training"

Showing 4 pages using this property.

(previous 25) (next 25)

W
Workshop, Architectures of online harassment, Berlin +	We gave each group a different use case- one group was to work on campaign harassment, meaning harassment from many sources. The other group dealt with more interpersonal, and one-on-one harassment. We did not give the groups explicit details of the cases they were to work on. We wanted to see how they developed the storyline and responded to prompts. This is a significant feature of a design thinking when it is used to learn about problems: to not be prescriptive or specific, but to allow for ambiguity in constructing what the problem is. Unlike campaigning and advocacy that script specific stories for the purpose of amplification, or a call to action, this approach attempts to leave received notions of an issue to one side. We imagined this exercise as a sort of projective technique, knowing that everyone in the room had a fair degree of familiarity with the topic. Working in small groups, participants were given choices of storylines to develop. One group was asked to develop a scenario of either two exes having a political disagreement online, or of a fight between two classmates that evolves into a bullying situation. The other group was asked to develop a story of an activist who faced harassment online, or of a journalist being attacked from readers for a story she had written. In response, the first group told the story of an anti-police brutality group that was attacked online for posting a report it had released. The second group constructed the story of two friends using Snapchat and where a personal interaction escalated into anger and bullying.  +
Workshop, Manuals with a gender perspective, IFF, Valencia +	> A. Mapping what is there in relation to guides on privacy and security with a gender perspective or that can be easily re-purposed with a gender perspective: Could you review this list and let me know if there are more resources on your side we need to add? https://gendersec.tacticaltech.org/wiki/index.php/Manuals_with_a_gender_perspective Idea would also to have participants reviewing and adding their own references too Mapping also what is not there and is needed? And why is it needed and/or why is not there? Format - other learning resources (video, graphics, movements) - interactions and achievement (games) - more art Content: - explain what is feminism - content for people with disability, more readable fonts and accessible images - digital story telling - generational gap (older people) - trainers content > B. Mapping our own community, improving practices: What are good practices for developing guides stand alone and guides with a gender perspective? Can we work on those guidelines (see proposal below)? + Understanding our own challenges and what we could do for/with the others? Before producing a new manual some questions we should askː Don't reinvent the wheel Are you duplicating upstream work? If a similar manual is already available Who's behind it? Is it a long-term project or a one shot one? Can you continue or complement their work? Who's the public and what are the objectives ? What are their security & technical levels? What are their comprehension about feminism? Who will produce/develop it and for whom (generational gap, geographical location, socio-demographic dimension)? Will your manual will be more about tools and how to configure those, or will it be more about threat modelling and/or behavioral processes? Under which license will you distribute it and which rights will you grant third parties (access, use, copy, remix, etc)? Credits your reviewers and experts that have provided you with feed back!! How will you maintain it? This encompass questions about frequency of updates needs depending of the tools and processes you will detail, and about processes you will run to engage your community in updating contents with you. How will you get feedback and peer review from readers? Will you be able to include all the feed back? (Some criteria will deal with correctness, completeness, up to date). Remember to always indicate the last date the manual has been updated/released. How will you achieve or not translation & translatability of your manual? Which type of platforms will you use for achieving the translation? Will you achieve also cultural translation for instance? Accessible for disable people Will you provide further support to the readers such as a contact mail or a hotline? How will you ensure that your contents are ethical, inclusive and trans-queer-feminist "approved"? How will we monitor the impact of our self learning resources/Impact Assessment methodologies? How the distribution will be done? What is the target public? Think about potential partnerships (researchers, academia, volunteer translators etc)  +
Workshop, Regional networks for tackling gender-based online violence, IFF, Valencia +	'''Examples of regional networks:''' > Community exchange system: https://www.community-exchange.org/home/ Here we exchange and share what we have to offer for what others provide using a variety of exchange methods: record keeping, time exchange, direct exchange, barter, swapping, gifting and sharing. Simply by keeping track of who receives what from whom we can dispense with the ancient idea of exchange media and the apparatus required to manage them. This helps us focus on providing and requesting what is really needed instead of chasing after money. This network is global and counts with many different local networks and different type of social money/currency (https://www.community-exchange.org/home/cen-statistics/). Experience has shown that those networks can only work properly (sustainable) if they are based on trust and trust requires mechanisms of get together/face to face. When those networks become too big, they tend to fail. Dimension here is how we build trust? Problematic for our case study/guidelines: How we build trust when counseling at distance? Or should it also provide face to face moments (specific physical safe spaces that can be used as get together places)? How we ensure that people seeking assistance know about those counsellings channels? How can we trust they are really seeking assistance? Vs how we ensure that people providing counseling are trustful? + platforms used to register incidents/tech related violence/attacks and to document the solutions or mitigation strategies activated > Pro-choice counseling and support: (http://abortoinfosegura.com/blog/todo-sobre-la-linea/): Hotlines can consist in phone numbers, twitter accounts, facebok chats and so on + it can also become face to face support accompanying women in order to get them misoprostol and/or traveling to spaces where abortion is legal > Hotlines against suicides (http://www.suicide.org/international-suicide-hotlines.html) Specific training for volunteers attending hotlines, some work 24/7, others on specific hours. Some are funded, partially or totally, some are totally volunteer based. Specific trainings entails specific curricula and training methodologies that mixes psychosocial wellbeing + skills and knowledge about orienting support seekers towards institutions and collectives that can help them face to face. Media guidelines for suicide (http://www.suicide.org/media-guidelines-for-suicide.html) . Orientation and guidelines for media covering suicides, do and dont's + good practices Critical elements: Cope with individuals facing a desperate moment, not making things worst = Do Not Harm approach + respect confidentiality and privacy of people calling ''' Why regional?''' Scope can vary a lot but we are thinking about a territorial scale that has some type of consistency in relation to legislation in place + type of ICT and uses of ICT being made + perception and types of tech-related violences taking place + social norms and cultural background (language for instance) '''Guidelines for building cases study''' Focus groups discussion for the case studies: How to create a network of support and counseling for women (and others) facing gender based online violence? Title case study: Why/Who? > Typology of tech-related attacks (list the 3 most common/frequent/probable ones) > Who is facing those attacks (women, trans, LGTBIQ, gender social justice activists, feminists organisations etc)? How to do the counseling and support? > Only at distance and/or face to face? - What are the channels and/or physical safe spaces that would be used for providing counseling?(mailing list, email, forum, phone hotline, chat, IRC, physical space) - > Capacity building: Which dimensions should be taken into account (need for trainings, self learning resources?) > Curricula needed for the capacity building: (psychosocial wellbeing, social support, understanding of laws and enforcement, knowledge on privacy and holistic security, etc) > Who can provide support? (individuals, champions, networks, communities,formal organisations) – what should be their skills, attitudes and required behaviors? Documentation/Incident report (document the incident – recommendations/response) > How the documentation of attacks and answers/mitigation measures/behaviors should be achieved? (no personal identifiable information for instance) > What would be the adequate platform for achieving this documentation/incident report? (wiki –website – flyers – others) > Who can view/edit/comment on this documentation/incident report? > Interaction between the local/regional production of incident reports and top down global resources that can be repurposed Other characteristics of the network > Resources needed (technical, infrastructure, money, trainings/capacity building, autonomous servers etc) > Sustainability(volunteer base, need funding etc?) > Resilience(how to build trust in the network, standard of quality, follow up of impact etc)  +
Workshop: Health, sexuality, algorithms and data +	Activity two was inspired in 'adapted applications scoring system'  +

(previous 25) (next 25)