Safe Spaces as Feminist Practices

Safe spaces have been used over and over by groups and individuals marginalized in societies and communities. Safe spaces have been a way to care for one-self and for a collective, to design and craft strategies and tactics of resistance and to create an oasis of peace in what sometimes can be a tiring struggle for feminist resistance. Safe spaces have taken different meanings and bear different names depending on a variety of factors be it geographical, temporal, spatial, cultural and social, among others. The British author Virginia Woolf's talked about a Room of One’s Own, a term often used by feminists to describe safe spaces. Cyberfeminist scholars and activists have early on recognized the internet as a whole as a perfect space for women. In her book Zeroes + ones: digital women + the new technoculture , Sady Plant proposes that cyberspace has a feminist essence, and is therefore a ‘natural’ space for women to inhabit. Rosi Braidotti in her book Nomadic Subject focuses on the fluidity and mobility aspects of online spaces suggesting that the collective bonds created by feminists on the internet is a distinctive practice and one of their priorities.

What is the Relationship between Offline and Online?

The relationship between the online and offline worlds were addressed early on by cyberfeminist scholars and activists. Donna Haraway in her Cyborg Manifesto questioned binaries such as women/men and human/machines. This was an important step in framing the internet as a force that shifts gender regimes of power and help feminists escape from embodiment. The issue of escaping gender, race or other intersectional forms of oppression has since then been further nuanced highlighting different experiences online particularly with the targeting of outspoken feminists and women’s rights defenders, and it’s repercussion offline. This has opened the door for a safe space framework that foster empowering experiences online.

While focusing on intersectional related experiences online, it is also crucial to remind ourselves of the materiality of cyberspace. Connecting the dots between the seemingly immaterial digital age and its material impact on the social, the labor, the environment, among others, is fundamental from a feminist perspective. We have to bear in mind that cyberspace is related to the intense extraction of resources such as rare minerals and metals, such as coltan, gold, copper, etc. to build our digital devices and the exploitative nature of labor, mostly females in electronics factories and the profound gender and race inequality in the Information Economy.

What are Safe Spaces?

A common understanding of safe spaces are that they share common values, whether explicit, through a community agreement, or implicit through the sharing of values and enable members of a group to flourish, empower themselves and create community. The concept of safe spaces as embodied in second wave feminism in the western world was “explicitly committed to safety for individuals or communities that are targets of oppression” (Newman 2011, 138)1. Safe spaces are known to have provided a safe speaking and awareness raising environment for women involved in the women's liberation movement in the 60s and 70s in many countries where women could discuss about their experience in a patriarchal environment. In this sense, safe space denotes the possibility to speak and act freely, generate strategies of resistance and build community, among others. Safe space are also about pushing boundaries and confronting certain difficult issues among a group of people such as who can be part of a women's only group? Who can be defined as a woman? As these are important questions to be addressed, they need reflection, trust, the understanding of where our own assumptions come from and therefore safe space are the perfect venue for this.

Safe Space strategies have been used recently during the USA Occupy movements where many women, queer and trans did not feel safe to camp in the squares and parks. Some resorted to women-only tents, or women of color-only affinity groups while others mostly transwomen, opted for an online presence has putting their bodies on the line were deemed too dangerous. In Tahrir Square in Egypt, Operation Anti Sexual Harassment (OpAntiSH) was set up to react to a hostile environment and as a way to protect women and/or confront harassers and support survivors of sexual abuse and harassment. In Kenya, the women-only Umoja village was created for women survivors of rape and sexual assaults where they could feel safe and secure, raise their kids, earn a living collectively, heal and reclaim their dignity. The concept of safe space has changed over the years, and has been interpreted differently depending on context, but nonetheless the concept is still central to feminist pedagogy, organizing and liberation.

What is the difference between creating Safe Space Online and Offline?

The creation of safe spaces offline has been experimented with for many decades and championed by women's rights defenders, feminist, LGBTQI, anti-colonial movements and people of color movements, but the creation of safe spaces online is somewhat of a newer strategy. The question that emerges is: How can we transfer our knowledge of building safe spaces offline to the online world? This transfer might require a bit of tweaking around and creativity since the modalities under which digital spaces present themselves are relatively different from the offline world. What is certain though is that cyberspace makes global feminism possible in one's offline world as it is linked to the intimate, the immediate, the personal and the collective.

Digital spaces are unique in multiple ways. Many women have reported experiencing the internet as a safe space for resisting gender oppression that they encounter in their every-day life. Fereshteh Nouraie-Simone talks about the internet as Wings of Freedom for Iranian women. Scholar Saskia Sassen argues that the internet allows women to be involved in new forms of contestations, build global community and potentially transform local women’s conditions. While these emancipatory experiences exist, and cannot be undervalued, women can also experience cyberspace in very different ways. Anita Sarkeesian who is behind the Feminist Frequency was in 2012 the target of an online harassment campaign following the launch of her Kickstarter project called Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. She was harassed online and still is because she highlights sexism in video games. This story is not a unique case, it happens over and over.

Inhabiting the web as a feminist and according to the boundaries we want to set for ourselves is not always easy. Therefore, certain strategies and tactics might help in establishing safe spaces. As the web is relational, we should always remind ourselves of the potential impact that our behavior on the internet has on our network: What is the potential consequence of tagging someone on a picture? What does this picture reveals? What is the implication of revealing where you and your friends are or were on social networking sites? Do you need to have consent of your friends prior to putting info on and about them on social networking site or on discussion list? Whose is on this discussion list?

Using safe spaces tactics and strategies is a good way to start inhabiting the space both online and offline according to the boundaries we want to set for ourselves and for our friends. This manual intends to do just that. To provide you with concrete suggestions on how to create safe spaces online and offline. It is divided in three core parts. First, a set of tools will be highlighted to move forward with starting to build safe spaces for you and your collectives/organizations through online communication such as mailing list, pads, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), etc. Second, it will focus on how to build safe spaces in “hostile” environments such as howto organize Wikipedia storming and edit-a-thons, how to install bots against trolls, how to do feminist counter-speech and finally, how to build safe spaces off line such as through women-only/feminist-only space to learn and Do-it-Together.

A) Building Online Safe Space for you and your collectives/organizations

We often assume that online communities such as the ones we take part in through social media, email discussion lists, phones and Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channels are inherently democratic, horizontal, participatory and relatively safe. It is true that the affordances of those technological tools may no doubt foster participation, a sense of emancipation and reach that was unimaginable two decades ago, but to be able to really harness the power of these tools and create a safe space for us and our collectives a few steps are recommended. We start with the premise that we should carefully think about the type of spaces we want and the type of behaviors we aim at fostering online and offline and make those visible and explicit.

As in the offline world, we need to remind ourselves that online spaces and online communities often reproduce hierarchies, privileges and power relations that exist in society and therefore thinking through ways to mitigate and limit these downsides to get the best out of our spaces is important. This is about caring for ourselves and for the communities we are part of. Making explicit and visible these issues is about agency, social justice and feminism, and it will help better shape the spaces we care about, we organize in and in which we grow.

What is Netiquette?

First, we need to think about the basics: netiquette. Netiquette is a concept that emerged in the 90s with the increase in communication technologies through the Internet. It is a portmanteau of network and etiquette. With the realization that the internet has brought us a “cultural web” that cut across all sort of boundaries be it legal, geographical, cultural, social, etc. there was an attempt to identify common standard of etiquette. Others, mostly feminists and social justice activists have understood netiquette has going further than simple politeness. It is about embodying online the principles that you believe in offline. It is about individual and collective care and empowerment. It is about connecting the global feminist movement across boundaries in their diversity, their differences and similarities.

In 90s, two authors came up with recommendations of how to behave online using the humoristic Ten Commandments format to do so. Brakeman came up with The Ten Commandments of Etiquette on the Internet while Rinaldi came up with The ten Commandments of Computer Ethics. The commandments were a humoristic way to address the distinctive features of the Internet where it was believed that there is a general lack of authority on who is able to regulate the behavior of online participants. The commandments highlighted for instance to “Never forget that the person on the other side is a human being” or that you should “Give back to the community”. Today, when we read these commandments, some are still relevant, while others seem to somewhat go counter to the ways in which the Internet culture has developed and the strong presence of feminists online. Also, Ten Commandments framework have also emerged for social medial use, cell phones use, among others.

What are Feminist Principles on the Internet?

What is closer to today's feminist practice on the internet are the Feminist Principles on the Internet . Those principles were developed in 2014, almost 20 years after the drafting of the above netiquette principles. The Association for Progressive Communications (APC) gathered a group of feminists to a Global Meeting on Gender, Sexuality and the Internet with the mandate to come up with a first list of principles. Their principles are about the ways in which the internet can be a transformative public and political space for feminist and queers. It situates online violence and tech-related violence on the continuum of gender-based violence making clear the structural aspect of gender violence online and offline. The principles also highlight surveillance as a patriarchal tool whether it is used by the state, private individuals or corporation.

Why are these principles important?

The Feminist Principles on the Internet are a good way to address the relationship between the online and offline world making for instance the link clear between online and offline violence. The goal behind these principles are two-fold. First, it is a tool for feminists, GLBTQI and women’s rights activists to guide them in understanding the internet as a new public space and how this space can be informed by feminist principles. In other words, it is about reframing the conversation around gender, sexuality, sexual rights and the internet. Second, it is a way to reclaim the Internet in creating spaces for feminist. If you want to contribute to the discussion join the hashtag #ImagineaFeministInternet.

Tools

How to set up a Safe Space Mailing list?

Mailing lists are one of the oldest forms of social networks. They allow you to discuss, share information, exchange video, audio and pictures. The below section will help you in the steps to setting up a safe space mailing list.

Choosing a mailing list

You have decided that you need a communication channel for your collective and/or your group, well you will be happy to know that you have many possibilities to choose from. For social justice activists oriented mailing lists you can look at Riseup collective and Autistici/Inventati (A/I Collective). They both provide services that are an alternative to corporate ones.

Riseup is a tech collective which provides secure communication tools for people working on liberatory social change. They have many feminists and queer oriented lists and therefore are a great collective to host your mailing list. To see some of the existing mailing lists go to: https://lists.riseup.net/www/ Riseup also provides email addresses so if you are an activist and want to open an account it’s a great email address to have. The allocation of an email address is based on trust system. You can either get two invite codes from friends who already have riseup accounts or wait for Riseup to approve your detailed request. https://user.riseup.net/forms/new_user/first

Other tech collectives offer activists’ mailing-lists. Autistici/Inventati (A/I Collective) also provides mailing list. To read about their service visit: http://www.autistici.org/en/services/lists.html Open or closed list?

Once you are ready to create your mailing list you need to decide whether it will be an open or closed list. An open list allows anyone to subscribe and participate in the list. A closed list is limited to the subscribed email addresses that will have been approved by you or your collective. In deciding what is best, you should remember that on open lists (or public lists) archives are available to anyone on the web, whereas closed list (or private list) are limited to those who have the subscription password. If you intend to talk about sensitive issues (talking about feminism is often a sensitive issue!) you might want to set up a private or closed list. Also, if you choose to set up a public list the messages sent through it will eventually end up on search engines (such as google). This is a privacy and safe space issue and feminist should be mindful of this.

Who should I invite?

Once you have your list set up, start inviting people you know to your mailing list. If friends are suggesting to add more people to the list, ask them to explain to the list the reasons why such and such person should be added. If you get a green light, add this person to your mailing list. Working through the web of trust is a good practice to follow when setting up a mailing list. Also, make sure you have a discussion on who can be part of this list. If you set up a feminist list, who can be part of this list? Do you for instance allow feminist men to be part of the list? If so, will you be setting up a policy for your list on the acceptable behavior? (See below for how to set up a policy) These are important questions that you need to discuss with your group. But don’t be too harsh on yourself and your group and know that you can always revisit these decisions if at some point you and your collective feel you want to change your collective mailing agreement.

Who will administrator the list?

Who will be administering the list? One person can be responsible for doing it, but depending on her/their time, availability and interest having only one administrator can be quite demanding. You can also choose to have more than one administrator of the list. It is really up to you to decide the ways in which they want it to be managed. A list can also be collectively managed. As a case in point, the Spoon Collective, a discussion list active in the 90s, had decided upon a strategy of central collective "ownership". This meant everyone had access to the administering of the list. In other words, the list was “owned” by all involved in the collective. The ways in which The Spoon Collective decided to operate was that all the people on the list would be responsible to manage it on the basis of a weekly rotation (adding new member, etc.). For feminist social justice activists, this is a strategy that can be best used when you are part of a closed knit collective. It also requires trust that all members will care for enough for the list to manage it collectively.

Before trying to figure out what best suits you, you should think about internet access and expectations from list members. Depending on where you are located, some people on the list might not have regular access to the internet and this needs to be factored in when taking the decision. Some tensions will inevitably arise from the collective administering process and therefore you and your collective need to think carefully about the ways in which you will handle these tensions. Are we ready to wait for a few days to have new members in the list? If each message needs admin approval, are we ready to accept waiting for the message to be approved for a few days, a week, more? What about unconscious errors being made by administers of the list (deleting the list, deleting members, changing the status of the list, etc.)? Since administering a list is a great way to learn is it only those who are tech savvy that might manage it or should we rather allow for learning to happen? If your expectations are clear the possibility for tensions and conflicts to emerge will be minimized.

Mailing list policies

Now that you have a mailing list and you are slowly getting started with it you might want to reflect about having a policy. Making visible your policy and the ways in which to report violation to the policy, even if it is a closed list, might be helpful in creating the online safe space you want everyone to enjoy. Having a visible and explicit policy will send a strong signal of the importance of creating a safe space on a mailing list. The geekfeminism wiki as a great example of a women-only policy for online communities (http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Statement_of_purpose/Women-only_communities). They also have a similar policy or agreement for online communities that includes men. http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Statement_of_purpose:_communities_including_men Check them out and adapt it to your needs, belief and desires.

To make your policy visible and remind everyone of its existence, Ada Initiative mailing list is an instructive example. They have decided to add to each email sent on the list a reminder that a policy is in place. Below is what you see at the end of each email message being received on the list.

Policies for behavior on this list:

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Statement_of_purpose/Women-only_communities http://sf.adacamp.org/attendee-information/policies/#ahp Contact Adacamp-alumni-owner@lists.adainitiative.org to report violations Please avoid gendered assumptions and language about the list as a whole (eg "XX", "ovaries", "ladies") To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.adainitiative.org/listinfo.cgi/adacamp-alumni-adainitiative.org

Dos and don’ts on mailing list

Mailing list have a particular set of features. Since they are text-based, they are susceptible to interpretation. First make sure you read carefully what is presented to you. Sometimes we read too fast and don’t fully understand what somebody is saying. Multilingual users can also be a challenging environment. What do you do if after carefully reading a message you disagree with what someone has said on a mailing list? Disagreeing on statements and points of view is fine and can be a good learning experience for all provided it is done in a respectful manner. Starting your email on a positive note and highlighting something positive will be a great opening for a constructive criticism.

If you are stressed you might be more sensitive and try to recognize this in you. If you have read an email that affects you emotionally, instead of replying right away try to come back to it later as to calm down. With the ubiquity of the instantaneity and immediacy afforded by social media we have a tendency to want to reply right way. If you find yourself too emotional you might want to wait a little bit before sending the message. Having said that as feminist we acknowledge that emotions and affect are important and ought to be made visible, so the suggestion to wait depend of course on the situation. You are the best judge of the practice you want to embrace.

Other Collective Tools

There are other good tools to working collectively on the internet. We suggest a few below with ways to create safe space.

What are Pads?

Pads are a great way to collaborate in real-time on documents with other feminists and social justice activists. They are a good alternative to replace google docs or replacing the tedious and sometimes confusion that arise from sending each other documents through emails. Pads can be used to collectively draft a mailing list policy, draft a statement that you want to release or else. A list of pads that are secure to use through encrypted connections via SSL can be found at: https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/wiki/Sites-that-run-Etherpad-Lite

Riseup is a great and secure provider of pads, but you have to know that they will be deleted after 30 days of inactivity. If you want your pad to last longer you can use other pads.

When you create a pad you decide on the name of the URL. It is usually a good practice to use a long name for your pad. Having https://pad.riseup.net/p/feminists might not be the most secure name. You want to use a more complicated URL such as https://pad.riseup.net/p/FeministsRocksAndTheyWillBeDoingGreatThingsToghether. Once the pad is created you send the URL to your friends and colleagues to start collaborating on a document. Pads allow you and your collective members to be either anonymous, use a moniker or decide to use your real name. There is a color-based system (you can decide on the color you use) that differentiate the contributions of each participants on the pad, so being anonymous will not bring too much confusion while writing. If you want a more secure pad that are not open/public you can use a password protected pad. If you are scared that your pad might be vandalized by trolls even if you have a strong URL and use SSL resorting to a password protected pad might be a good option. For this check out: https://www.protectedtext.com/

What is Internet Relay Chat (IRC)?

IRC can be defined as a “group of electronic interaction media that combine orthographic form with the ephemerality of real-time, virtually synchronous transmission in an unregulated, global, multiuser environment”. In other words, it is a text-based social media that requires very little bandwidth. It’s like a multi-user chat and you have the option to encrypt if you want. But, you can’t embed video, audio or pictures, but you can link to them.

IRC can be used for multiple purposes. It can be used to facilitate collaboration between feminist activists and women’s rights defenders in addition to decision-making processes. You are thinking about starting a campaign to advocate for women’s rights or want to launch a project to supports feminist activists in your country, IRC might be a good way to start discussing about these projects in a collaborative manner. IRC allows for real-time collaboration provided of course that you have all easy access to the Internet. If access to the Internet is an issue you might want to consider using your mailing for better decision making process as it allows for asynchronous communication.

Also, when planning an international IRC session between many feminist participants this means determining who would get up early and who would stay up late. This is an important issue for women’s rights defenders and feminists who might have kids and older members of the family to take care of, or have to deal with power outages occurring at certain times, or other impediments that prevent them from being online at certain hours. This is why it is important to think about asynchronous (delayed-time conversation) and synchronous (same-time conversation) means of communication. Feminists might want to ask themselves how same-time (synchronous) and delayed-time (asynchronous) communication technologies affect collaboration and decision-making. Internet is such a great medium since it allows women’s rights defenders and feminist activists the opportunity to structure their interactions and practices as they wish and thus harnessing the affordances that the internet give us might be very empowering and allow to counter access barriers, language barriers, among others.

When you suggest to use IRC you should be mindful of the aforementioned. It is not because it is the tool used by feminist hackers and programmers that it is the best tool for you. If you still decide to use IRC, be mindful that feminists in your collective and other feminist activists might need time to understand this technology and to understand how to best collaborator on such platform. Depending on your skills, using IRC might appear to be fairly “easy” or a bit more difficult, but what is less tangible is the ways in which one develops interpersonal relationships and communicate socio-emotional content on IRC.

How it works?

To choose an IRC client we suggest you look at the Prism-Break web platform, a site that has been developped after the Snowden revelations which supports you in opt-outing of mass surveillance programs: https://prism-break.org/en/categories/os-x/#irc . If it's your first time on IRC and just want to try it, we suggest to use a web browser application such as Freenodes: https://webchat.freenode.net/ or Koumbit/Indymedia: https://chat.koumbit.net/ . You can instantly create a nickname and select a chanel that your friends and colleagues will have shared with you.

Once you start your meeting it is useful to appoint a facilitator that will keep track of time and topics to be discussed and which might ask participants to re-focus if the discussion goes off track. When you start a conversation take time to say hi and greet people. It is particularly important to talk to new comers. If a group of feminists know each other over IRC, they might have a tendency to chat to one another and/or give more importance to what their friends say. In order to create a welcoming environment and a safe space acknowledging and valuing the voice of everyone will be key on IRC.

While carrying on the discussion, let's remind ourselves that writing is not easy for everyone and/or that many might not be using their mother tongue. IRC can also go very fast, particularly if you are many in the discussion, so allowing everyone to slow down and let people read all the inputs might be important to have an empowering discussion. Deciding for instance of speaking turns might facilitate the meeting and allow for everyone to have their voices heard. Each people in the IRC meeting could be speaking in alphabetical order of nicknames (or any order you want to give) on all the points addressed. This will give more structure to the conversation and help diminish the possibilities of the domination of one or few people in the conversation. Also ending what you have to say with “over” or “finish” or "Done" might be a good practice. Make those agreement visible and explicit, probably in an email asking people for an IRC meeting. Finally, IRC meeting can be very tiring so setting a time-limitation might be useful not to ware people out.

B) Building safe spaces in “hostile” environments (do and don'ts supporting people subject to online violence, storming wikipedia and organising edit a thons, installing bots against trolls, feminist counterspeech – swarming together)

The Internet can feel as an unsafe space sometimes. However, there are ways to counter hostile environment and create collective responses to enable speaking up, agency and resistance. Organising online collective actions can be a very powerful exercise to resist what can be a hostile environment. They can also bring attention and visibility to certain issues and in turn help bring about transformation. Storming wikipedia collectively, using feminist counterspeech on twitter and swarming together can all be important acts that have an impact at the discursive, pyschological and material levels. And they are fun too ! Mostly because they are creative, bring about individual and collective agency and the feeling that you are not alone.

Dos and don'ts supporting people subject to online violence

(NEEDS TO BE STRENGTHENED)

When women's rights activists, feminists and LGBTQ people are under attack online there are a few steps to follow to support her or them.

Try to be quick! Though remember that knowing what to do and how to do it in such situation needs a lot of practice to become good at it. But as a general rule, you should tell yourself that gender-based violence online is unacceptable. This should be your main message if you don't have a lot of practice in dealing with such phenomenon.

If you are close to the person under attack offer immediate assistance. In the event of Doxxing, where confidential info has been released on the internet about the person, you might want to offer a safe space (a home) if the person does not feel safe to stay where she/they lives.

If you do not know (well) the person, you can speak out. Collective actions are often more effective than individual actions. Make sure you gather a group of friends, and the friends of your friends for a Twitter storming for instance. Make visible the issue! This will show to the person under attack that you and others care and that such acts are not OK.

Depending on the nature and context of the attack, you might want to speak out to the media and highlight the gendered nature of online attacks. Using the media to bring light to a situation can be an important way to bring about visibility to an issue. As a best practice we recommend that you consult the persons under attack. If you do not know her/they go through the web of trust. You can contact friendly and/or feminist media. Prior to doing so, we recommend that you form a group of people in opposition to such violence, draft a press release and explain what is gender-based violence online and why it exist.

If you are part of an organisation or network you can write a solidarity statement that explicitly says you condemn online gender-based violence. If it's a person from your organisation who has been under attack, make sure she/they read the solidarity statement before it is being released. The person will feel that her team mates care and respect her/they wishes. It will also allow the person to have agency over what is written.

As an ally, that is someone who want to support a disadvantage group, but who is not part of that group (e.g. men are allies when it women to women's rights issues), you ought to speak out and say “NO” to online harassment. Speaking out ought to happen in the public space. This is very important. Do it all the time that you witness online violence! The culture of impunity to online harassment will continue.

Installing Bots Against Trolls And Swarming Toghether

[FAITH'S PART]

Is There a Gendered Construction of Knowledge on Wikipedia?

Feminists have criticised the way in which knowledge is produced, made and constructed on Wikipedia. The fact that Wikipedia’s contributors are mostly male (about 10% are women though this can vary between countries) in their twenties and thirties and disproportionately Western are important factors that influence content. Women who have played a significant role in history are often missing from Wikipedia and, at times, feminist, queer and trans content are not always easily accepted on the online encyclopedia. A notable example relates to an entry about Chelsea Manning, the United States Army soldier who was convicted in July 2013 of violations of the USA Espionage Act after releasing the largest set of classified documents to WikiLeaks. When Manning formally announced her gender transition, the English Wikipedia entry under her name was quickly amended to reflect this change. A week after intense discussions regarding this amendment took place, where a majority of Wikipedians disregarded experts on transgendered issues, the article was reverted back to Bradley Manning. The article has since then returned to Chelsea Manning (at least in the English language).

What does it mean to Storm Wikipedia?

“Storming Wikipedia” is a response to the lack of women, feminist, queer and trans content on wikipedia and as mentioned above the low percentage of women contributing to Wikipedia. Wikistroming, Storming Wikipedia or Edit-a-Thon focus on learning collectively how to edit Wikipedia. Women might have the impression that the barriers to entry to edit wikipedia are high. Therefore, editing and creating pages about women and feminist work, among others, is a great way to confront fears, add feminist, queer and trans content on the online encyclopedia and Do-It-With-Others (DIWO).

How to organise a Wikistorming?

There are always great reasons to organise a wikistorming on any day! However, if you are looking for broader impact and be connected to others such gatherings wikistorming often happen on these two days: Ada Lovelace Day on October 14 and March 8 International Women's Day. Once you have decided on a date, gather a group of feminists and women's rights activists who want to learn or already know how to edit wikipedia and identify a safe space where to hold the event. It can be held in someones home, in a community center, at an art center or a community organisation. Make sure you find a place that is accessible and ideally that already has a feminist base. Wikistorming may last for a day or half-a-day. Before the wikistorming or as part of it, decide which wikipedia entry you want create or which existing page you want to edit. Be realistic in your goals and don't put too much edits on your plate! To edit wikipedia carefully it takes time. If you want to organise a wikistorming visit: http://femtechnet.newschool.edu/wikistorming/

Feminist Counterspeech

Feminist counterspeech can be an effective tactic to trigger a new narrative online and make visible the effectiveness of collective feminist actions online. Feminist counterspeech is a form of discursive resistance that enable a group of feminists to expose in a playful manner the political nature of an online comment, meme, Twitter Hashtag, etc. Feminist counterspeech allow to call out of misogyny and sexism online in a humoristic way. It is important as it makes visible both weak and strong feminist networks online.

Despite the unprecedented speed and immediacy afforded to digital tools, and the affective responses it can engender in us for the better and for the worse, it is important to recognize that feminist counterspeech has no doubt impressive potentialities, but that there are also limitations particularly with its temporal aspect. As feminists we must always consider the extent to which we engage with an issue and whether our actions aim at reshaping the relationship between gender, intersectionality violence and power online and off.

C) Building safe spaces off line (code of conducts for camps and conferences, getting more women in developing technologies – coding – making – biolabs, Building your feminist hackerspace, tech to identify/rate not/safe spaces)

[PAULA's PART - Beginning]

Building Safe Spaces Offline

Introduction

The most difficult thing about building 'safe spaces' for women is that there is so little agreement about what a safe space might look like and whether, indeed, it's a useful concept for women in tech anyway. I'm drawing on discussions and issues which have arisen in women's tech conferences and skills workshops I have been involved in, including Flossie.org, Fossbox, Autonomous Tech Fetish, and Eclectic Tech Carnival to explore some of these differences, how to facilitate discussion of them, and how to arrive at a shared idea of an appropriate space for women to engage with tech.

Every group has to work out its own idea of an appropriate space for women. Once you have arrived at a shared ideal, it's time to look at the practicalities of implementing these ideas in material, offline, spaces. This will include thinking about how much formality you want, what kind of formalities, how you will accommodate diversity, how you will facilitate participation for all the women attending both in terms of your practical arrangements and in the way you formalise the social space.

What is a 'safe space'?

The difficulties in defining what a 'safe space' should look like arise from the enormous diversity among women themselves and the many different ways of articulating a feminist identity. Women's idea of what might be experienced as politically, socially or personally threatening varies and women may face very different levels of threat from state agencies or socio-economic environments which also affect how shared spaces should be organised. There are other pragmatic considerations. Taking into account all of these competing narrations of feminism, contexts, practical issues and potential consequences it is no small task to create a safe space for women to engage with technology!

Perhaps the first thing I would like to make as clear as I can is that it can never be possible to create a space which will be experienced the same way by everyone because everyone brings their own contexts and histories with them. It is important to be aware of the danger that in struggling to perfect a feminist safe space one always runs the risk of creating, instead, yet another form of social control and pressure to conform to a particular image of what a woman is.

So, overall, the most important thing to remember is that every woman is different, every woman has her own experience, history, context and needs. Emotions themselves are often not safe, there is always risk and vulnerability in opening yourself to new experience. The more diverse the environment, the more emotional risk we open ourselves to as ideas and ways of being may be fundamentally challenged. So we are not aiming for the avoidance of any kind of conflict or emotional risk but, instead, to provide buffers, understanding, reciprocation, support, love, and care for each other and for our shared endeavour. We must take every possible step to ensure that practical needs are met (protecting anonymity, respecting diversity, dealing with harassment, providing appropriate living space etc), and on collaboration, facilitation and mediation.

Women only?

This question can be one of the most divisive as it will often touch on women's strongly held sense of their political, personal, sexual and social identities. It can raise up issues of sexual orientation and gender identity as well as mobilising all kinds of other loyalties. Some will prefer a women-only environment, some will feel that this opens up an opportunity for external attacks on the whole project by anti-feminist tech men whilst some will feel that male friends and colleagues will be unfairly excluded and resentful. Discussion can sometimes divide along lines of sexual orientation or of feminist conviction - or just between women who regularly work alongside men in the tech industry and women who would like to learn tech but find learning alongside men challenging. These divisions will also never be clearly defined - individuals don't take neat 'sides' as they probably have multiple modes of identification.

Declaring an event women-only will often also raise a bitterly divisive question on the status of transgendered women. Some will not accept transitioned identities as 'authentic' whilst others will argue that there is no such thing as an authentic gender identity and it is up to women to decide for themselves how they identify their own gender. In my experience it's best to be flexible on all these questions as rigidity can easily disrupt collectives or cause individual women to become distressed and even leave the group.

At Eclectic Tech, it was decided that the Carnivals would be women-only and this would include all women who identify themselves as women. Flossie.org began on the same basis but changed its policy to women-only as speakers or facilitators whilst sympathetic men could attend as participants. Fossbox varies its gender policy according to the aims and contexts of each individual workshop whilst ATF welcomes all women, trans, queers and sympathisers.

These variations take into account all kinds of issues including the balance of positions within feminism represented among the group, aims and objectives, and practical issues. Some of the things to consider are:

• Think about boundaries for the debate -- agreed framework, rules of engagement? How do we define 'woman'? How do we define 'safe'?
• Who do we want to include or influence, specifically women or also potential sympathisers?
• What is the balance of positions within feminism present in the group, is there a prevalent 'flow' of opinion?
• How important versus how contentious? Is it worth alienating some women from the group? How can we frame the debate to avoid alienating women who don't agree with the decision?
• How will the decision affect the actual experience of women within the space?
• Do we have all the skills we need to deliver this project among our feminist networks or will we need specific additional skills, where will we get them?
• How will the space be formalised to promote equal participation, especially if men are included?

Take your time to decide these questions, it's probably a good idea to record them somewhere so they can be referred to in future. If you use chat channels you can probably take a log of the discussion, if not, some form of minutes will be useful. You can then use this record as a basis for any formal codes of conduct or policies you want to draft later and to avoid getting stuck in endless arguments by having something clear to refer back to and for new participants to catch up.

What are you trying to do?

For some groups, discussion and reflection is a key activity which renders the whole group activity meaningful. For others, discusison is a source of vexation and obstruction from practical objectives. Again, this is a somewhat false divide as everyone needs to reflect and everyone needs to be practical. Nevertheless, there may be important differences in emphasis and these may be based on what you are actually trying to do. It's all too easy to become engrossed in the feminist politics and to neglect to make sure there's enough discussion on the specific aims of the project itself and on the experience of diverse participants.

Building offline spaces is easiest and most successful when you're clear about what you're trying to do and how you plan to go about it. Being clear about what you're trying to do can also shift debate through less painful channels and provide very clear, practical arguments for specific choices, making the discussion feel less emotive.

The first thing which must be considered is exactly what the event is intended to achieve. Women and tech events can probably be categorised something like this (again, this abstract division may not reflect the 'messiness' of practical activism):

• Advocacy: How do we change the culture of tech sectors to be more amenable for women, and/or let the world know that women are great at tech, and/or get more women involved?
• Skills: How can we learn to do xyz?
• Support, networking and boundary-crossing: What does it mean to be a woman in tech? How can women from different places or sectors come together to spark off new ideas and practices? How can we support each other as women in tech?

I think you can see right away how these different types of event might develop different gender policies even if the same group of women were organising them? For example, it's difficult advocating change in the male culture of tech sectors if you haven't invited men to hear what you want to say - but you might prefer to discuss *how* to do this in a women-only environment first. Or are you advocating engagement with technology to women and mainly want free, frank and mutually supportive discussion or skills-sharing? In this case, a women-only environment suggests itself.

With skills workshops, research generally shows that women learn tech skills best in women-only environments so these workshops have a very clear and communicable reason for being women-only. But you may still hear male allies grumbling that they also wanted to learn that skill and it isn't fair. So, in that case, we can either explain the benefits of women-only learning environments and recommend that a man step forward to run an open workshop, or we might consider compromising with women-only as facilitators but inviting open participation. Or, at Fossbox, we sometimes run the workshop twice, once for women-only and once for open participation - this way we can maximise women's learning spaces but avoid resentment. As a side-effect, it also gives male supporters a chance to experience the benefits of tech workshops run by women as 'safe spaces'. Men often feed back that they have changed their own practice because they found the experience so positive - which brings an advocacy as well as skills outcome!

It's also important to remember that building offline spaces is resource- and labour- intensive and often many compromises have to be made. It may be a good idea to try to identify as early as possible which values are shared, important, and relevant to the event so that you can constantly remember to prioritise those and de-prioritise less important or potentially divisive issues.

Building a Safe Space

Once you have settled the basic questions about what your event is *for* and who you want to invite, it's time to think about formalities - but let's not start by re-inventing the wheel. There are many different ways of organising different kinds of spaces, I'm not going to go over all of them here but just outline a few of those most popular with FLOSS communities.

• Temporary Autonomous Zone: An alternative to traditional models of revolution, the T.A.Z is an uprising that creates free, ephemeral enclaves of autonomy in the here-and-now. [| Beautiful Trouble]

• Un-Conference: creating a space that helps people make connections, share knowledge, collaborate and create brainchildren. To take part, attendees are encouraged to give a presentation, create a discussion, or even chair a debate [| Lanyrd on running an unconference] and [| Open Space]. Pros: relatively egalitarian (watch out for tyranny of structurelessness) and relatively easy to organise (no messing about with programmes, scheduling and advanced prep). Cons: can be extremely intimidating and therefore exclusionary towards less experienced or skilled women and stressful if you need to organise tech or other resources for specific activities in advance.

• Workshop: transferring skills or knowledge in an interactive session - there are thousands upon thousands of workshop methodologies so selecting a workshop format is very much about being clear about what you want to achieve. Workshops are a good format for building skills or for maker and design activities.

• Makerspace: makerspaces are community spaces with tools [| Makerspace Community] - great for women to 'get their hands dirty', you can mess about with anything from taking computers apart to making music with bananas or even building a WWII PoW radio out of razorblades and copper wire!

• Sprint: A sprint is a get-together of people involved in a project to further a focused development of some aspect of the project such as working on sections of code, writing manuals or books etc. [| Wikipedia on sprints] and | Flossmanuals Booksprints]. These are effective at getting a lot done quickly for code and manuals (less so for other forms of writing) but very exhausting and emotionally demanding - make sure you keep food and drink coming!

• Hackathon: "programming till someone drops from exhaustion" [| Global Voices on how to run a hackathon]. Hack events can also mix different groups like NGOs with hackers to come up with new approaches to building tech for that group.

• Seminar: bringing together small groups for recurring meetings focusing on a particular subject, in which everyone present actively participates, or offering information or training on specific topics [| Wikipedia on Seminars]. Pros: structured activity supports women with less experience or confidence, planning for tech/resource support is easier, people know what to expect. Cons: can be overly structured and lacking spontaneity for more experience women, more 'carnivalised' or 'top-down', more organisational effort in advance.

Your choice of format is going to be about:

• what you're trying to do - ask yourself which format will support this activity best?
• participants' needs, existing skills, experience and preferences
• practical considerations - what physical spaces are available, what will they allow you to do, what resources do you have etc?
• Your organisational resources - how much can you take on?

Choice of workshop or seminar format is obvious for skills sharing, it can get more difficult to decide for advocacy and networking events. Advocacy events can be some of the most challenging as it's easy to spend the entire day 're-inventing the wheel' with male participants who're new to the questions. If inviting men to advocacy events it's probably best to go with a more structured format. This also applies to any very culturally mixed environment (eg background, sector, educational level, gender, generation, etc rather than culture of national or linguistic origin) - unconferencing and hacking works best with activists or experienced practitioners who are used to a high level of self-determination and with a shared understanding of implied rules and structures. Having said that, it can work well to try more open formats anyway but be prepared for some skilled facilitating to make it safe and fun for less experienced participants as well as the more experienced.

It's perfectly fine to mix and match approaches to suit what you're trying to do and whom you're doing it with - so go ahead and experiment. All the groups I work with mish-mash different formats together - whatever works!

Formalising the space

It's important, especially in mixed environments, to think about what's acceptable behaviour in the space and what isn't. In order for this to have any practical effect, you also have to think about what you'll do if individuals breach this - or when things go wrong generally.

You can find plenty of information and example policies on the [| Geek Feminism Conference anti-harassment/Adoption page]

It should be obvious if your event will bring together women from diverse backgrounds that practical issues such as dietary requirements will need to be addressed at offline events. However, there may be other significant considerations which are more difficult to foresee. Keep an open mind and to avoid escalating conflicts unnecessarily. It's important to remember that "one woman's wine is another woman's poison" and your policy should be about preventing aggressive behaviour and not about trying to 'police' how women identify, communicate or present themselves as long as this is not creating a serious threat to other women.

It's also worth remembering that women who are struggling in a culturally unfamiliar environment can become confrontational more easily than they usually would. Some cultures are also more comfortable with confrontation than others. There's probably a higher representation of women with aspergers in tech environments who will have difficulty in coping with social or other aspects of the environment. There may be many reasons why a woman might be struggling to communicate positively at any given moment. It's key to remain calm and to give women space to experience their emotions and express even negative feelings of anger or frustration without being judged or escalated. We are different, let's celebrate it, even when it's difficult to do!

Respecting Privacy

• Don't take or circulate sound, video or photos without permission - if anyone present faces significant external risk then don't take photos at all unless participants have given express permission and an opportunity to cover their identity.

• If you wish to record the event, prepare formal consent forms telling people exactly what audio-visual records are being made and how they will be stored and used and ask for clear consent with a signature.

• Don't share details of anyone's participation, speech or actions on social media without their express permission.

• Refer to Infrastructure sections to understand how to set up secure networks

Some tools for learning to code and make

Case Studies

I'm going to look at two women-and-tech spaces to see how their aims, participants and context influenced their format.

Eclectic Tech Carnival

ETC was organised on an 'unconference' model using a combination of university spaces, art centres and community centres. It is relatively well-funded and so is able to bring women in from all over the world. It is located in a different city each time and organised by a group from that city in collaboration with the core ETC collective. It provides 'full board' space for participants and also partners with additional arts events located in the host city.

ETC made the decision to be for women-only: "Imagine you are alone and travelling in a country where you don't know the language and cultural intricacies. Do you remember how it felt when you bumped into someone just like yourself?". It was also generally agreed that women should decide their own gender and sexual orientation.

Partcipants are culturally diverse but mostly from arts, academic, non-profit and related tech backgrounds. This means that they have a lot of experience in self-organising and thrive in a relatively unstructured environment. The code of conduct tends to be implicit rather than stated.

Eclectic Tech Carnival spawned [| Transhack 2014] and also Flossie.org. ETC and Transhack's relatively coherent culture has fostered the development of a strong focus on reflection and feminist practice. It has been an influential and much-loved space for more than a decade.

Flossie

Flossie runs a conference and also skills workshops and was based on the ETC format. It is intended to combine advocacy, boundary-crossing, support and skills-sharing bringing together women involved in digital arts with coders, artists, and makers. There are various problems with trying to bring the ETC format to the UK which has an extremely marketised academic/arts/non-profit sector and is outside of the Schengen area making it very difficult for non-EU women to attend in person. Eventually, we decided to do something a little different. We had a small amount of funding from Google which didn't cover 'full board' and, in any case, it's impossible to find spaces such as the schools used in ETC in Austria in the marketised UK public sector. We were able to make video links for women outside of EU to contribute and London is a highly diverse city in any case. We weren't able to stream the whole event publically because of bandwidth problems at the university which hosted us.

I the end the bigget difference came from involving more women from pure tech and engineering sectors. We had worked with Ubuntu Women and the Women's and Open Source Groups at the British Computer Society to involve women from purely technological backgrounds as well as digital artists, activists and makers in order to foster wider skills sharing and open up access to high-level computer skills for women. This was very popular but also opened out all kinds of communication difficulties as the groups had quite different cultures and backgrounds.

The first issue raised by this was that many of the students who joined the collective wanted a more structured environment as they didn't feel confident in self-organising and more experienced organisers also felt the unconference structure could be a problem given the diversity of backgrounds and interests. The second was that a reflective approach became more difficult. In the first year, we held a panel to consider how we should go about building a positive representation of women in technology. This quickly became very dislocated and adversarial because, as we began to realise, there were many different models of feminism *and* of technology between women who were primarily tech/engineering, academics, and women who were primarily activists or artists. We decided to focus on the basic value we all shared - supporting more women to make better use of open technology and to move from being consumers to being producers. We had to deprioritise feminist reflection or debates about practice. This proved very effective in holding together these very different groups and building lasting networks with a positive and collaborative atmosphere.

[PAULA's PART - END]

What is a Feminist Hackerspace?

Hackerspace are often volunteer-run spaces based on the concept of openness, where in theory, anyone who is interested in learning about technology (software, hardware, etc.) can go. However, women have remained underrepresented in these spaces despite the attempts to proposed remedial strategies, such as women-only hack nights and the adoption of codes of conduct. The women-only hack night has howerver been met with controversy since it is deemed to go against the principle of openness.

What is a Feminist Hackerspace?

Hackerspaces are often volunteer-run spaces based on the concept of openness, where in theory, anyone who is interested in learning about and playing with technology (software, hardware, etc.) can go. However, women have remained underrepresented in these spaces despite the attempts to proposed remedial strategies, such as women-only hack nights and the adoption of codes of conduct. The women-only hack night has however been met with controversy since it is deemed to go against the principle of openness.

Other reasons have been highlighted to explain the emergence of feminist hackerspaces the difficulties in recognizing and acknowledging privileges along the lines of gender, race, ethnicity and class; and patriarchal behaviors that are prevalent in hackerspace. To change the aforementioned state of affair, feminist geeks, makers, artists and hackers have decided to start feminist hackerspaces. This shows that women are interested in technology, want to learn, look for a like-minded community and want to share their skills with others, among others.

Feminist hackerspaces are not all the same. They vary in form, shape and size. What seems to unite them though is a set of boundaries that they decide collectively (who can be a member, who can be a guest, etc.) and an explicitly belief in feminist principles. Feminist hackerspaces provide a place to work on projects in a supportive space.

To know more about feminist hackerspaces you might want to visit the website of: the Mz Baltazar’s Laboratory in Vienna (http://www.mzbaltazarslaboratory.org/), The Mothership Hackermoms in Berkley (http://mothership.hackermoms.org/), Double Union in San Francisco (https://www.doubleunion.org/) and FemHack in Montreal (http://foufem.wiki.orangeseeds.org/).