MediaWiki API result

{
    "warnings": {
        "query": {
            "*": "Formatting of continuation data has changed. To receive raw query-continue data, use the 'rawcontinue' parameter. To silence this warning, pass an empty string for 'continue' in the initial query."
        }
    },
    "batchcomplete": "",
    "continue": {
        "gapcontinue": "Red_pill_or_blue_pill?",
        "continue": "gapcontinue||"
    },
    "query": {
        "pages": {
            "2547": {
                "pageid": 2547,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Readings Surveying for collective learnings into ressources",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "Surveying (Arpentage in french) is a method of discovery of a work by several people, with a view to its critical appropriation, to nourish the articulation between practice and theory. \n\nThis method can be used on law books, theories, tutorials, wiki pages.\n\nWhile it can be difficult or boring to bear the burden of reading, studying and understanding written resources - which can reinforce a situation or feeling of isolation - surveying provides a collective dynamic for appropriating knowledge. A method that can be deployed in safe/brave spaces.\n\n= Oringin =\n\nMethod of collective reading coming from the working class culture (working class circle) in XIXe century to read books known to be difficult to read  and then reused by practitioners of mental training during the Second World War by resistance fighters ( [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joffre_Dumazedier Joffrey Dumazedier]), more widely disseminated by Peuple et Culture, popular education movement, from the 1950s. \n\nIts goal is to achieve, in a limited time (2 - 6 hours), to \"brush\" a work by pooling the knowledge, experiences and intuitions of the participants.\n\n'''Readings surveying is about raising collective and political issues.'''\n\nSurveying, which refers to the action verb \"to survey\", consists first of all of appropriating space, of being in action. The people walk through the room or an outside place and get to know each other before starting to read, To plant their \u00ab\u00a0ice axes\u00a0\u00bb in knowledge that becomes available to them.\n\n= Goals =\n\n* Desacralize the object text or book or wiki page or whatever felt as hard to understand, popularize reading\n* Spread an effort over several motivated and determined people\n* Experience cooperative and critical work\n* Facilitate understanding by a heterogeneous group\n* Create a common culture around a subject, a theoretical and/or technical knowledge\n* Understand that no knowledge is neutral, that all points of view are situated in a political field\n* Put participants in capacity:                                                                                                                                                                                      \n** to reflect individually on collective reflections;                                                                                                                                                                            \n**to share knowledge, ideas and insights;                                                                                                                                                                                                          \n**to approach reading in a singular form: collective and partial.\n\n= Method =\n\n== Equipment and needs ==\n\n* Two or three copies of the chosen work,\n* Large sheets of paper, pens, markers, simple papers for notes\n* Copies of the cover, the table or index and the image attached to the book if it is not on the cover (e.g. back cover).\n* Scissors or knife\n* A place where people feel safe end free to be themself\n\n== Number of participants ==\n\nfrom 4 to 20 people? \n\n'''Remember never to overcrowd a space at the risk of creating bad feeling for those present.'''\n\n== Duration ==\n\nDepending on the size of the text or content to be surveyed, allow between 2 and 6 hours.\n\n'''And especially plan for breaks and breathing times.'''\n\n== Progress ==\n\n=== Explain, introduce,  provide context ===\n\n'''Explain''' Who, why, what, how, what for, collective and individual rules to people\n\n'''Introduce''' the purpose and aims fo this session\n\n'''Putting the book and its author in context'''\n\nThe facilitator proposes content that he or she has read and that is of particular interest in relation to the theme or themes that the group is working on. \n\n(e.g. documentation on installation and use of TAILS during a workshop, or \n[https://web.archive.org/web/20190407065811/https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html Data as capta: from information visualization to graphical expressions of interpretation] or an Angela Dabis Book)\n\nPresentation by the trainer of any particular information about the author or the group behind the project studied, its place in the intellectual universe, the time and reasons for writing (the code is writing) this book and the image attached to it. The person can also invite the group present to comment on the title and everything that the group may have observed about the work in question up to the formulation by the group of elements of the content of the document (make hypotheses about the ideas developed in the book or doc).\n\n'''Organizing the reading'''\n\n# cut the book, or the printout, or the copies, to distribute an equal part of text to each without regard to the chapters (by dividing the number of pages by the number of readers)\n# tear off each of its parts to assign them to each reader \u2212 one part tear off for one group\n# ~ 45 minutes to read about ten pages per group\n# possibility to isolate oneself at the place that is suitable for reading. Each participant reads his or her part as he or she wishes.\n\n=== Reading ===\n\nIt starts when it starts and it ends when it ends. The people who read are the right people and they are in charge.\n\n=== Bring together ===\n\n'''The reel'''\n\nOpen the plenary session with a space/forum for expression, free reactions at the end of the reading. This step allows the form or the content to take a foothold in the restitution, including on the register of the sensitive. For example \"he wrote badly...\".\n\n'''Restitution''''\n\nThe restitution does not necessarily take place from start to finish of the read. Each person will be allowed, without obligation, to answer a few questions in order to reconstruct elements of his or her reading:\n\nTable of exploitation of the book, resources or whatever, for each one\n* key ideas\n* questions I have\nwhat I already knew\n\nRestitution in plenary group by part, one restitute, another written on paperboard or on a window or a paper tablecloth in front of him or on the sheets of paper posted on the wall, the \"strong points\" approached by the reader. On the \"poster\" are indicated all the chapters of the book as cut out by the number of readers. \n\n'''Back to the readings surveys method'''\n\nReactions at the end after the operation on the surveying technique: everyone's experience, reuse? Possible openings from this reading?\n\n'''Exploitation or extension of Surveys'''\n\nProposal to write, alone or with others, a text for the exploitation of the work based on four questions:\n* \"what echoes my practice and knowledge prior to this reading\"?\n* what I agree or disagree with\" with the purpose of the work\n* \"what I'd like to say to the author(s)\".\n* \" choose a word, a notion, a concept, that you would like to define (in academic version and in general public explanation version) and/or a couple of words that makes you think \"\n\n'''Option'''\n\nIf necessary critical comment on your part either on the method of the survey (cold of the exercise), or on its reuse in another context in your presence, or on the attempt to transmit ideas strength of the work to other people who have not read the work\n\n= Where to use? =\n\nHere are some situations in which we have used it and it worked :\n\n* Pop biology workshop in a bar onto \u00bb Chthulucene, Capitalocene, Anthropocene \u00bb text\n* Exposing The invisible Workshop onto the [https://kit.exposingtheinvisible.org the kit resources]\n* [https://notecc.frama.wiki/atelier:corps_machine_desideration Atelier Corps, machine, Bio, Homo, ou plus compliqu\u00e9 ?], text corpus\n* [https://tails.boum.org/doc/index.en.html TAILS] documentation\n* More\u2026\n\n\n\n\n\n\n [[Category:How_To]]"
                    }
                ]
            },
            "507": {
                "pageid": 507,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Reconnaissance",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "The pentesting (jumpy and creative) \"reconnaissance\" process can be useful for research. What if, for example, we want to know (more about) the current state of [[Timeline_that_is_soooo_1984_...#Smart_Cities|smart cities]]? \n\n== Querying DNS servers ==\nThe <code>whois</code> system is used by system administrators to obtain contact information for IP address assignments or domain name administrators. <code>dig</code> is a networking tool that can query DNS servers for information. It can be very helpful for diagnosing problems with domain pointing and is a good way to verify that your server configuration is working. An alternative to <code>dig</code> is a command called <code>host</code>. This command functions in a very similar way to dig, with many of the same options. And if <code>dig</code> and <code>whois</code> do not provide you with enough information, tools like <code>dnsmap</code> and <code>dnsenum</code> can be handy.\n\nWhen you have an IP address an IP lookup will provide details such as ISP name, country, state, city, longitude and latitude. Domain names can help us to find out important information such as address, email id and phone number.\n\nUsing whois from the command line you may or may not get useful results. It runs on port 43, and information returned is in plain ASCII format, but because whois servers all over the internet are managed by a wide variety of organisations, information returned may vary. And the different whois clients have different functionality too.\n\nWhois proxies can be used between a client and a server. Those usually use the http or https protocol. If port 43 is blocked, that is not a problem when a client is using proxies through a browser. Also, likely a proxy will determine which server to contact for different lookups.\n\nAlmost all services prevent data mining for preventing data gathering for spamming, and that also limits the service for other purposes such as intelligence gathering. Recently, some ISP\u2019s are discussing limiting their service even further.\n\nRWhois (referral whois) is a directory services protocol which extends the whois protocol in a hierarchical and scalable way. It focuses on the distribution of \u201cnetwork objects\u201d (domain names, IP addresses, email addresses) and uses the hierarchical nature of these network objects to more accurately discover the requested information. It is similar to DNS but apparently, still not in general use.\n\n== Enumerating targets ==\nEnumerating targets on a local network can be done with <code>nmap</code>, <code>arping</code>, <code>hping</code> and <code>fping</code>. The last three allow for constructing arbitrary packets for almost any networking protocol, for analysis of replies.\n\n== Resources ==\n* Hack Back! A DIY Guide for Those Without the Patience to Wait for Whistleblowers http://leaksource.info/2014/08/09/hack-back-a-diy-guide-for-those-without-the-patience-to-wait-for-whistleblowers/"
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    }
}